Pathfinder Cinematography Free Lead Adds
Three companies of paratroopers travel in a deadly mission to France to prepare the drop zone for the airborne attack on the D-Day. Recognizing that professionals know when to break the rules and when to abide by them, this book discusses many examples of fresh ideas and experiments. It certainly doesn’t help that they’re coming out after 300, a film that isn’t exactly the height of textual depth itself, but that at least manages to deliver its empty thrills with high style.Distribuito dalla 20th Century Fox, interpretato da Karl Urban, Clancy Brown, Ralf Moeller, Moon Bloodgood, Russell Means, Jay Tavare e Nathaniel Arcand.Cinematography presents the basics and beyond, employing clear explanations of standard practice together with substantial illustrations and diagrams to reveal the real world of film production. PATHFINDER might have worked on the page at one point, and there are some interesting ideas in the film, but the combination of Nispel’s truly inert “action” filmmaking and Karl Urban’s charisma-free lead adds up to a film that I can’t imagine recommending to anyone. He’s oh-for-two in my book now, and I really don’t understand why anyone would trust him to make a narrative film at this point. It’s just a non-movie, and I think that can be dumped firmly on the shoulders of the nigh-incompetent Marcus Nispel.
Eventually he has to face another boatload of Vikings, and has to choose between the people that sired him and the people that raised him. Not that I'll see it 6 times or anything, but I could stand to see it again.In case anybody forgot the plot, this is that Viking movie where a young Norse child gets abandoned in Novia Scotia and is taken in by a Native American tribe (the "People of the Dawn"). I went into this with zero expectations, and was pleasantly surprised.
While it bothers me that it can't commit, it soon becomes immaterial.The first test of any movie of this sort for me is the Conan test. It's a legend, and it's based on some kind of historical fact. What follows is the legend." So. This one never seems to decide which it wants to be - the cheesy plot crawl that follows the most abrupt title sequence I've ever seen introduces the idea that 600 years before Columbus landed, a group of European raiders attempted to settle North America.
But poorly cut and insipidly scored. It's bloody, it's savage, it's almost exciting. After about 15 minutes of origin and intro, a band of Vikings arrives to subjugate or slaughter the natives prior to settling down, and wipes out our hero's village. PATHFINDER? It fails, but only because of some sloppy editing and an uninspired score by Johnathan Elias. GLADIATOR passed - but just barely. If the first battle in a movie can't hold its own against CONAN, then chances are I'm going to shit all over it.
It was around this point that the movie I had been prepared to shit on became a movie I was grudgingly starting to like.I won't spoil the rest of it, but it takes some familiar paths, and throws a few little twists into the mix, while becoming (almost by accident, one feels) compulsively watchable. There are several dozen Vikings, each 7 feet tall, covered in spikes, and dripping gore, being picked off by a rather unlikely trio. This chunk of the movie plays like a combination of FIRST BLOOD and the last act of PREDATOR, and while it's certainly a bit derivative, it's also pretty badass. Aided by the obligatory female love interest (the attractive - and awesomely named - Moon Bloodgood) and a village idiot character who simply doesn't know any better, Ghost sets about trying to lead the Vikings away from the fleeing villagers while thinning their ranks as best he can. It works this movie's all about keeping it simple.About halfway in, as Ghost attempts to lure the Vikings away from the next village, the movie picks up some momentum, and suddenly becomes a much better movie.
0 kommentar(er)
